- Home
- App Analytics
- OxMET
- OxMET Vs. iReadMore
OxMET vs iReadMore Usage & Stats
OxMET was developed by the Translational Neuropsychology Research Group at the University of Oxford. The OxMET cognitive screen has been standardised, normed and validated (Webb et al 2021, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation). OxMET is suitable for use with adults, and in chronic (greater 6-month post-stoke) and subacute (greater 3 months post-stroke).
The tool is not for self-assessment. Instead, OxMET provides health professionals with a brief, ecologically valid, assessment of executive dysfunction using a naturalistic shopping scenario. The test is automatically scored and evaluated against age adjusted norms (three age groups; under 64, between 64 and 72, and over 72). Upon completion, a visual snapshot report is automatically generated and can be stored locally on the device. The information contained in the report is not in itself a clinical diagnosis. The report should be used to inform a clinical diagnosis that takes into account all relevant clinical factors.
- Apple App Store
- Free
- Medical
Store Rank
- -
iReadMore is a new reading therapy for improving single word reading ability.
It is for people with an acquired reading disorder (alexia) or aphasia due to a stroke, brain injury or dementia.
Start your 7 day free trial now!
iReadMore Features:
Adaptive Algorithm - iReadMore adapts to your abilities, keeping the therapy relevant and challenging.
Self-led Therapy - iReadMore allows you to be in control of your own therapy with unlimited access.
Science-Driven and Clinically-Proven Results - All of our therapies are developed through years of dedicated research at University College London by a team of scientists and clinicians.
Integrated Feedback - Complete reading tests and see your own progress.
iReadMore Research Summary:
- iReadMore therapy has been tested in two clinical trials. It was shown to improve reading ability in people with pure alexia (Woodhead et al., 2013) and central alexia (Woodhead et al., 2018)
- In the clinical trial of iReadMore for central alexia (the most common form of acquired reading disorder), the average improvement in reading accuracy was 8.7% for trained words. Three months after finishing the therapy, users still had significantly better reading ability than before they started.
- Anonymised results from the app will be collected to test how effective the app is and to improve our understanding of reading rehabilitation.
For more information and help getting started with iReadMore, please visit: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/icn/research/research-groups/neurotherapeutics/therapy-apps/ireadmore-app
If you have any other questions, please email us at ireadmore@ucl.ac.uk
iReadMore is a Class I CE marked medical device.
- Apple App Store
- Free
- Medical
Store Rank
- -
OxMET vs. iReadMore ranking comparison
Compare OxMET ranking trend in the past 28 days vs. iReadMore
Rank
No Data Available
OxMET vs. iReadMore ranking by country comparison
Compare OxMET ranking trend in the past 28 days vs. iReadMore
No Data to Display
Compare to any site with our free trial
OxMET VS.
iReadMore
December 17, 2024