- Pagina principale
- Analisi delle app
- Piles Capacity
- Piles Capacity Vs. Continuous Beam
Piles Capacity vs. Continuous Beam Utilizzo e statistiche
Mobile Design Tool for Cast-in-Place Bored Piles
Piles Capacity has a modern design which priorities speed and simplicity.
Up-to-date estimation engine documented in a brief and straight-forward online reference manual ( http://www.hetge.com/PCref )
Featuring a unique soil profile builder, Touch Soil™. Visually build required soil profile with the ease and convenience like never before.
Works with either Metric (mm, metres, ton, kN, kPa)or Imperial (inch, feet, psi, psf, kips) unit systems.
Graphs depth vs. friction, tip and allowable bearing capacities with optional correction of tip resistance with respect to underlying strata.
Prepares detailed report for bearing values of each layer with average effective stress, skin friction and tip resistance at top and bottom of layer.
Uses advanced soil parameters for more precise estimation such SPT, cohesion increment with depth, diameter reduction in rock as well as partial safety factors for skin friction and tip resistance.
- App Store di Apple
- A pagamento
- Produttività
Classifica degli store
- -
Continuous Beam application will provide you the Shear and Moment Diagrams for a beam with an unlimited nbr of spans based on three moment equations.
- App Store di Apple
- A pagamento
- Produttività
Classifica degli store
- -
Piles CapacityRanking a confronto con Continuous Beam
Confronta la tendenza di classifica Piles Capacity nei ultimi 28 giorni rispetto a Continuous Beam
Rank
Nessun dato disponibile
Classifica Piles Capacity vs. Continuous Beam per paese a confronto
Confronta la tendenza di classifica Piles Capacity nei ultimi 28 giorni rispetto a Continuous Beam
Nessun dato da visualizzare
Fai confronti con qualsiasi sito con la nostra prova gratuita
Piles Capacity VS.
Continuous Beam
gennaio 17, 2025